Re: [anti-spam-wg] About DNSBLs vs greylisting - Was: Steve Linford and Spamhaus Internet Terrorists
From: Walter Ian Kaye walter@localhost
Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 22:05:38 -0700
At 06:23a +0200 08/24/2006, Paul Wouters didst inscribe upon an
electronic papyrus:
On Wed, 23 Aug 2006, Esa Laitinen wrote:
ps. I receive the mailing list perfectly, no need for personal
copies of messages.
:0 Wh: msgid.lock
| formail -D 8192 ~/.procmail/msgid.cache
Or ask the list maintainer to change the Reply-To, because to not
send you a duplicate, I have to remove you from the To:, which then
becomes empty, and I have to move the list address from the CC: into
the To: or else you;ll complain about an empty To:.
Well we all have to do it. So if the rest of us do, then it can't be
that hard. ;)
But I would also vote for Reply-To munging, and I think 'Precedence:
list' goes along with that?
you are here: RIPE -> RIPE Maillists > Archives
