Re: [anti-spam-wg] Imaged spam

[Jørgen Hovland jorgen@localhost]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "peter h" peter@localhost
> The real name for this is bullshit. HTML is for spammers and cluless 
> folks.
If HTML didn't exist and the only way of sending email was with plaintext, 
you would still get spam, now wouldn't you? The format does not matter.
So please go somewhere else nagging about non-existant problems. Namecalling 
doesn't solve the equation either. Personally, I would rather have fancy 
spam than boring plaintext spam. Besides, it is easier to detect (both 
programatically and manually). If you have a security issue with HTML then 
it is a problem with the implementation you are using. Blaming HTML for that 
is, what you say, for "clueless folks". I am sure you are not one of those.
j