[anti-spam-wg@localhost] new RR type

[Meng Weng Wong <]

On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 02:13:09PM +0200, Paul Wouters wrote:
| 
| Doing it in TXT records is clumsy. We (as in IETF dnsex group) are doing something
| really wrong if people need to keep abusing the TXT records for stuff. I guess
| it would be good to start with, but ideally a new RRtype should be used.
| 

does using a new RRtype mean that nameservers everywhere must be upgraded?

thanks
meng