[anti-spam-wg@localhost] Re: Abuse contact

[Florian Weimer <]

Sabri Berisha sabri@localhost writes:

> Perhaps you'd be better of adding this to the IRT objects?
>
> http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-254.html

Isn't the IRT object dead?

Personally, I think it's more important to require functional (!)
email (!) contacts for inetnum objects (and allocate the necessary
manpower to be able to investigate reports of broken addresses)).

Of course, this is whishful thinking because no one is going to pay
for the work involved.