Re: automated spam detection

[Carl Moberg <]

Ragnar Lonn wrote:
> 
> I think maybe I didn't describe my idea thoroughly enough. This is
> the basic concept:
> 
> You implement a filter that accepts everything by default. It does,
> however, spool messages it suspects are spam. Rather than deliver
> them. It can start suspecting messages being spam when they appear enough
> times, have certain keywords in their headers or body, etc, etc.
> 
> When a message is spooled, an operator is alerted. Maybe by email. The
> filter asks the operator "Is this spam?" and the operator gets to reply.

 I think this has been said before...

  "breach of privacy"

-- carl