[address-policy-wg] 2008-05 Revised/New Discussion Phase set (Anycasting Assignments for TLD's and Tier 0/1 ENUM)

["Antoin Verschuren" <Antoin.Verschuren@localhost]

PDP Number: 2008-05
Anycasting Assignments for TLD's and Tier 0/1 ENUM

While I strongly support the proposal for more than 1 anycast assignment
per TLD/ENUM tier1 operator, I do have some problems with the definition
of the ENUM tier1 operators.

Where it says:

"ENUM operators as defined by the ITU"

I think it should say:

"ENUM tier0/1 operators as defined by RIPE NCC"

I wouldn't want the ITU to determine who should get address space, and
the counterpart for IANA in the ENUM space is RIPE NCC.
I see the ITU more in the role ICANN has with regards to TLD's, or
perhaps even the US DOC.

Antoin Verschuren

Technical Policy Advisor
SIDN
Utrechtseweg 310
PO Box 5022
6802 EA Arnhem
The Netherlands

T +31 26 3525500
F +31 26 3525505
M +31 6 23368970
E antoin.verschuren@localhost
W http://www.sidn.nl/