Re: [address-policy-wg] 2008-05 Revised/New Discussion Phase set (Anycasting Assignments for TLD's and Tier 0/1 ENUM)

[Tomas Hlavacek <tomas.hlavacek@localhost]

Greetings!

I support this proposal.

Usually I do not like making special cases and introducing any 
inequality. But I understand that gTLD, ccTLD and ENUM tier 0/1 deserves 
some kind of special treatment. And I think we would be against 
ourselves blocking TLD and ENUM tier 0/1 operators from making their 
service more resilient and secure.
Best regards,
Tomas Hlavacek

Ana Matic wrote:
> PDP Number: 2008-05
> Anycasting Assignments for TLD's and Tier 0/1 ENUM
>
> Dear Colleagues,
>
> The text of the policy proposal 2008-05 has been revised based on the community feedback 
> received on the mailing list and during RIPE 57.
> We have published the new version (version 2) today.
> As a result a new Discussion Phase is set for the proposal.
>
> You can find the full proposal at:  
>
>   http://ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2008-05.html
>
> We encourage you to review this policy proposal and send your comments
> to address-policy-wg@localhost before 5 January 2009.
>
> Regards,
>
> Ana Matic
> RIPE NCC 
> Asst. Policy Development Officer
>   
--
Tomas Hlavacek <tomas.hlavacek@localhost