Re: [address-policy-wg] Revisiting RIPE Policy Proposal 2007-01

["Jeffrey A. Williams" jwkckid1@localhost]

Michael and all,

  Is this suppose to be surprising?  After all isn't this the attitude
of what "Authoritative" is supposed to be?  Aren't all RIR's always
right, and therefore omnipotent?  How could anyone DARE
question even in the slightest way, on any issue, or response to
a question, unless they were irreverent, irresponsible, disrespectful,
disruptive, or even insane?  >:)

michael.dillon@localhost wrote:

> > The invitation goes to the ripe announcement list.  One of
> > them had the following headers...:
>
> This message illustrates a disturbing trend with RIPE.
> People associated with RIPE, either the NCC or otherwise,
> seem to always assume that RIPE is right, and the LIR is
> wrong. Then they write an email that demonstrates to
> a careful reader, that RIPE is wrong or confused or
> too lazy to take the time to read the original email.
>
> --Michael Dillon

Regards,

Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 284k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln
"YES WE CAN!"  Barack ( Berry ) Obama

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS.
div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail
jwkckid1@localhost
My Phone: 214-244-4827