Re: [address-policy-wg] Revisiting RIPE Policy Proposal 2007-01

[Sander Steffann sander@localhost]

Hello Clive,

>> Note that I'm not a lawyer - but as far as I understand, this is  
how the
>> articles of the NCC are set up.  The majority of the LIRs (+proxy  
votes)
>> that attend the AGM vote for the board members and decide on the  
charging
>> scheme (and possible changes to the articles).
>
> But what is the quorum for the meeting? Is it really as small as  
under 1%?
> If the meeting isn't quorate, its decisions are invalid.

If you want to discuss RIPE NCC member related issues, I think you  
should start a discussion on members-discuss@localhost. Discussing the  
RIPE NCC AGM on this list is not really appropriate. We should focus  
on address policy development here. I understand that this touches  
both RIPE policy and RIPE NCC membership/fee issues. Let's discuss  
each issue on the appropriate list.
Thanks,
Sander Steffann
APWG co-chair