About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section

Re: [address-policy-wg] IPv6 assignment for the RIPE meetingnetwork

  • To: Nick Hilliard nick@localhost
  • From: Alex Le Heux alexlh@localhost
  • Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 15:18:05 +0100
  • Cc: Andrei Robachevsky andrei@localhost, "address-policy-wg@localhost" address-policy-wg@localhost

Dear Nick,

Please see RIPE NCC Registration Services' answer to your questions ragarding
proposal 2006-01 below:

More generally, if Organisation X already holds IPv6 space, whether PA or
PI, and where:

1. they are not using the entire address block for their infrastructural needs, 2. they intend to organise an event which requires a separate IPv6 address
block for routing purposes,
3. the total number of /64s required for both their normal infrastructural
needs and their event requirements does not exceed their existing ipv6
assignment
4. that assignment is either for a once-off or a periodically recurring meeting

then in this situation, would the RIPE NCC registration department be happy
to assign an ipv6 address block for that purpose?  My take on this is
probably not. But it would be helpful to get a formal opinion from this
from the RIPE NCC.

The current version of proposal 2006-01 contains the provisions for assigning
more than a single /48 to an organisation:

Additional assignments may also be made when there is a technical need demanding this or usage justified. When possible, these further assignments will be made
from an adjacent address block.

Only very large networks would qualify for multiple /48 subnets under the "usage justified" provision. However, networks that have multiple unconnected end-sites and intend to originate the prefixes from different ASNs could qualify under
the "technical need" criterion.

So an organisation that has received a prefix for its infrastructure could still qualify for an additional assignment for organising a meeting, although
this would depend on the details of their network setup.

In the specific case of the RIPE NCC organising the RIPE meeting, the issue of
the contractual relationship would have to be resolved first.

Best regards,

Alex Le Heux
RIPE NCC Policy Implementation Co-ordinator



 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | Copyright Statement
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community