About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section

Re: [address-policy-wg] Revisiting RIPE Policy Proposal 2007-01

  • To: Gert Doering gert@localhost
  • From: "Clive D.W. Feather" clive@localhost
  • Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 08:34:08 +0000
  • Cc: Hank Nussbacher hank@localhost, address-policy-wg@localhost

Gert Doering said:
> > Interesting that 52 attendees out of 6000 RIPE members are able to make 
> > such a change.
> 
> Note that I'm not a lawyer - but as far as I understand, this is how the
> articles of the NCC are set up.  The majority of the LIRs (+proxy votes)
> that attend the AGM vote for the board members and decide on the charging 
> scheme (and possible changes to the articles).

But what is the quorum for the meeting? Is it really as small as under 1%?
If the meeting isn't quorate, its decisions are invalid.

-- 
Clive D.W. Feather  | Work:  clive@localhost   | Tel:    +44 20 8495 6138
Internet Expert     | Home:  clive@localhost  | Fax:    +44 870 051 9937
Demon Internet      | WWW: http://www.davros.org | Mobile: +44 7973 377646
THUS - a Cable and Wireless business



 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | Copyright Statement
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community