RE: [address-policy-wg] IPv6 assignment for the RIPE meetingnetwork

["Remco van Mook" <Remco.vanMook@localhost]

Hi Wilfried,

That thought also crossed my mind, and while it sounds more elegant and
efficient it would also require a policy change in another RIR :-) I'll
try to do a formal policy proposal somewhere in the following weeks.

Best,

Remco
(and it'll give that hat we both have something to do)


-----Original Message-----
From: address-policy-wg-admin@localhost
[
	    
	    
] On Behalf Of Wilfried Woeber,
UniVie/ACOnet
Sent: donderdag 4 december 2008 19:24
Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] IPv6 assignment for the RIPE
meetingnetwork

Gert Doering wrote:

[...]
> Which leaves the problem of "an entity assigning to itself, and doing
a
> contract with itself" - which can be seen as a problem with
neutrality.
> 
> Remco has made a suggestion how to tackle *this*, and I see this as
the
> way forward.

This is at least *one* (very good!) suggestion. I can think about
another
equally simple (and maybe more efficient) one: Submit the request to a
different RIR for review and approval :-)

> Gert Doering
>         -- NetMaster

Wilfried



This email is from Equinix Europe Limited or one of its associated/subsidiary companies. This email, and any files transmitted with it, contains information which is confidential, may be legally privileged and is solely for the use of the intended recipient. If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this email immediately.  Equinix Europe Limited. Registered Office: Quadrant House, Floor 6, 17 Thomas More Street, Thomas More Square, London E1W 1YW. Registered in England and Wales No. 6293383.