Re: [address-policy-wg] Revisiting RIPE Policy Proposal 2007-01
-
To: michael.dillon@localhost
-
From: Gert Doering gert@localhost
-
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 16:19:09 +0100
-
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
-
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=testkey; d=space.net; b=ilkWenHrrdDYIGObE0Bxo4P8O17xmtn14WINSRQtuJp6yyja/JtvSpEGo5mgqhDS ;
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 04, 2008 at 02:35:20PM -0000, michael.dillon@localhost wrote:
> > The invitation goes to the ripe announcement list. One of
> > them had the following headers...:
>
> This message illustrates a disturbing trend with RIPE.
> People associated with RIPE, either the NCC or otherwise,
> seem to always assume that RIPE is right, and the LIR is
> wrong. Then they write an email that demonstrates to
> a careful reader, that RIPE is wrong or confused or
> too lazy to take the time to read the original email.
I have the feeling that you're unhappy with my e-mail.
The intent of showing these headers was "that's the date, the message-ID
and the subject of the mail, so maybe it's easier to track what had
happened with this information".
Not working for the RIPE NCC I can't say for sure how this mailing list
is maintained - and from a LIR perspective, all I can say is that I've
been on that list since we became a LIR, some 10 years ago. At that time
I didn't know anything about RIPE, so I assume that the listed contacts
get/got added automatically.
(Oh, btw, maybe I should point out that you are also "part of RIPE", and
thus the statement "... that RIPE is wrong and confused" could encompass
your mail as well. And RIPE-as-the-whole-community is certainly too lazy
to read e-mails. So what is your point?)
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 128645
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
|