Re: [address-policy-wg] IPv6 assignment for the RIPE meetingnetwork

[Rob Blokzijl k13@localhost]

On Thu, 4 Dec 2008, Andy Davidson wrote:

> On 3 Dec 2008, at 10:48, Andrei Robachevsky wrote:
>
> > But meeting the "Contractual requirements" is more difficult, since in a 
> > way that will require the RIPE NCC to have a contract with ourselves and to 
> > evaluate our own request. Perhaps a more elegant solution here would be the 
> > one proposed by Remco back in November (to establish a policy that lets the 
> > NCC file a request in the ordinary way).
> Does "The RIPE Community" exist as a legal entity ?  Can the community hold 
> the meeting resources and agree to hold a contract with the NCC ?
    No, and No.
    That is one of the reasons that back in 1992 the 'RIPE Community'
    decided to create the RIPE NCC.

> Andy
    Rob