Re: [address-policy-wg] IPv6 assignment for the RIPE meetingnetwork

[Andy Davidson andy@localhost]

On 3 Dec 2008, at 10:48, Andrei Robachevsky wrote:

> But meeting the "Contractual requirements" is more difficult, since  
> in a way that will require the RIPE NCC to have a contract with  
> ourselves and to evaluate our own request. Perhaps a more elegant  
> solution here would be the one proposed by Remco back in November  
> (to establish a policy that lets the NCC file a request in the  
> ordinary way).
Does "The RIPE Community" exist as a legal entity ?  Can the community  
hold the meeting resources and agree to hold a contract with the NCC ?
Andy