Re: [address-policy-wg] IPv6 assignment for the RIPE meetingnetwork

[Marco Hogewoning marcoh@localhost]

On Dec 3, 2008, at 1:51 PM, Stream Service wrote:

> Hello,
>
> Wouldn't it be an good option if the RIPE meetings becomes organized  
> by
> another entity (for example a new organization (could be a  
> "vereniging" or
> "stichting", I cannot remember the correct translations for both  
> words))
> that only works on creating the meetings with support from RIPE NCC  
> (where
> needed). This would solve this issue and it would be easier I guess  
> to offer
> options to talk if you want things to be changed within the RIPE NCC.
Yeah and make sure the entity is registered outside of the NCC service  
region so any conflict of interest can be avoided :)
No really, don't you think this goes a bit too far ? Like Gert already  
posted, Remco made a suggestion which seems to be far and  
straightforward and if we get stuck in the 'NCC can't sign with  
themselves' I'm perfectly happy to have a chat with our sponsoring  
dept and run the request via our LIR so there is no need for the NCC  
to sign a direct enduser agreement.
MarcoH