Re: [address-policy-wg] IPv6 assignment for the RIPE meetingnetwork
-
To: Elisa Jasinska <elisa.jasinska@localhost
-
From: Randy Bush randy@localhost
-
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2008 07:48:15 +0900
Elisa Jasinska wrote:
> I can only second Niels here. While organizing conferences and events
> with network infrastructure myself, I can tell that it is a hassle to
> re-arrange temporary PI every time... so I do see the incentive. But why
> should the NCC be a special case and no one else?
perhaps someone could phrase the general case?
randy
|
you are here: RIPE -> RIPE Maillists > Archives
