RE: [address-policy-wg] IPv6 assignment for the RIPE meetingnetwork

[<michael.dillon@localhost]

> I can only second Niels here. While organizing conferences 
> and events with network infrastructure myself, I can tell 
> that it is a hassle to re-arrange temporary PI every time... 
> so I do see the incentive. But why should the NCC be a 
> special case and no one else?

I agree that it would be fairer to change the policy so that
any conference organizer can apply for a PI IPv6 address block.
They fill the role of a network operator for the attendees of
a conference and this should be sufficient justification.

IPv6 address space is NOT in short supply and we should not
treat it as a scarce resource at this time.

--Michael Dillon