About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
Next Sectionyou are here: RIPE -> RIPE Maillists > Archives
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section
<<< Chronological >>> Author Index    Subject Index <<< Threads >>>

Re: [address-policy-wg] Revised 2006-01 set back to Discussion Phase (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)

  • From: Andy Davidson andy@localhost
  • Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2008 10:02:20 +0000

On 25 Nov 2008, at 18:20, Nick Hilliard wrote:


Ana Matic wrote:
We encourage you to review this policy proposal and send your comments 
to address-policy-wg@localhost before 23 December 2008.


I support this proposal.
- while a requirement for multihoming is useful, it should be made clear 
during implementation that this is not necessarily a requirement for
multihoming using ASNs and BGP on the public Internet


I agree with Nick.


Andy
Post To The List:

Message References

<<< Chronological >>> Author    Subject <<< Threads >>>
 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | Copyright Statement
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community