Re: [address-policy-wg] Revised 2006-01 set back to Discussion Phase (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)
-
To: sergey miassoedov sergey@localhost, APWG address-policy-wg@localhost
-
From: Leo Vegoda <leo.vegoda@localhost
-
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 01:21:13 -0800
-
Accept-language: en-US
-
Acceptlanguage: en-US
Hi Sergey,
On 26/11/2008 8:13, "sergey miassoedov" sergey@localhost wrote:
[...]
>>> c) meet the requirements of the policies described in the RIPE NCC document
>>> entitled ³Contractual Requirements for Provider Independent Resources
>>> Holders
>>> in the RIPE NCC Service Region²
> LV> Is this document available for review yet? It seems to form an integral
> part
> LV> of the proposed policy.
>
> This is a part of accepted policy.
> http://ripe.net/ripe/draft-documents/ripe-new-draft2007-01-v4.html
Thanks for the reference. Much appreciated!
It would be fab if the RIPE NCC could provide appropriate linkage from the
proposal page to the Contractual Requirements document, so that anyone
reviewing the proposal can easily read the associated document.
Thanks,
Leo
|