Re: [address-policy-wg] Revised 2006-01 set back to Discussion Phase (Provider Independent (PI) IPv6 Assignments for End User Organisations)

[Garry Glendown garry@localhost]

Nick Hilliard wrote:
> - while a requirement for multihoming is useful, it should be made clear
> during implementation that this is not necessarily a requirement for
> multihoming using ASNs and BGP on the public Internet (however we care to
> define that term).  Private interconnection to third parties is also a
> fully legitimate justification for assignment of provider independent
> number resources.
>   
Concurred. E.g., IPv6 might not be available from the second provider of
a customer yet ...

Another "pro": Having customers with operational (and multi-homed-able)
IPv6 might increase pressure on those other ISPs that still haven't put
IPv6 into productive operation ...

-garry