Re: [address-policy-wg] IPv6 assignment for the RIPE meeting network
-
To: "Andrei Robachevsky" andrei@localhost
-
From: "Ondřej Surý" <ondrej.sury@localhost
-
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:28:47 +0100
Andrei,
2008/11/19 Andrei Robachevsky andrei@localhost:
> Dear Colleagues,
>
> This is an informal submission of the proposal that was presented at
> RIPE 57 in Dubai
> (http://www.ripe.net/ripe/meetings/ripe-57/presentations/Robachevsky-IPv6_assignment_for_RIPE_meeting_network.pdf),
> as was suggested by the community.
>
> Your feedback is appreciated as well as your opinion whether a formal
> submission should follow.
Brett and I are now working on updating 2008-05 proposal
to modify PI assignments for Critical Infrastructure.
I think that what we just need is to enlist RIPE NCC into
Critical Infrastructure providers and then there will be
no need for some special rule just for RIPE NCC.
Two other notes:
a) 'RIPE Meeting organiser' - I think it's just too much
complicated, while not just say, that RIPE NCC get's
prefix for RIPE Meetings and there is a time that RIPE
NCC is not organiser of the meeting it will allow new
organization to use that prefix?
b) My experience with /48 shows that it's not 'common accepted'
- you can check IPv6 anycast d.ns.nic.cz in DNSMON service.
But I support this size, since if routing is broken during
RIPE Meeting it will most likely get fixed very soon ;).
But generally speaking I support idea in this proposal.
Ondrej
--
Ondrej Sury
technicky reditel/Chief Technical Officer
-----------------------------------------
CZ.NIC, z.s.p.o. -- .cz domain registry
Americka 23,120 00 Praha 2,Czech Republic
http://nic.cz/
sip:ondrej.sury@localhost tel:+420.222745110
mob:+420.739013699 fax:+420.222745112
-----------------------------------------
|