About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section

Re: [address-policy-wg] Assignments for Critical Infrastruction

  • To: "Greg L." bgp2@localhost
  • From: Gert Doering gert@localhost
  • Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 23:06:54 +0100
  • Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=testkey; d=space.net; b=ktw92bXX6FLCC1n3uuBFPdppgVvaY1z397zhHRf96fJX9vs2vhYCWBo70KNiWkmy ;

Hi,

On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 04:55:22PM +0200, Greg L. wrote:
> Current IPv4 already provides more advantage to ccTLD and gTLD with IPv4 
> /24 prefix allocations for BGP anycast than for other business entities 
> that would like to get /24 prefix for BGP anycast DNS deployments.

Well.  I have not yet seen a specific proposal coming from a company
that explains what they are doing with anycast and that is *not* running
a *TLD (or ENUM).

So who are you, what are you doing, and what would be your proposal how
to amend the policies?

(If you're happy with Arin space, be my guest - less work for us)

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations:  128645

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444            USt-IdNr.: DE813185279



 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | © RIPE Community. All rights reserved.
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community