[address-policy-wg] Re: Assignments for Critical Infrastruction

[Stephane Bortzmeyer bortzmeyer@localhost]

On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 11:48:06AM +0100,
 Ond??ej Surý <ondrej.sury@localhost wrote 
 a message of 9 lines which said:

> We would like to see policy for IPv4 and IPv6 modifiedto allow /24
> *minimum* for IPv4 and /48 *minimum* togTLD/ccTLD.  First reason
> behind this is that one PI is not reallyenough and it's blocking us
> to deploy more DNS serversand make our TLD service more reliable.

As a TLD, I agree. ".fr" has currently two anycast nodes (managed
outside, so they do not use "our" addresses) and plan to add more and
to manage them ourselves. We will therefore need more than one PI prefix.

> And last, but not least, it would be good to keep thissynchronized
> with other regions (see [1],[2]).  Note:we may also extend the list
> of requestors to:Root DNS, ccTLD, gTLD, IANA, RIRs.Which I think is
> reasonable list.

ENUM "TLD" too, as discussed on monday :-)