Re: [address-policy-wg] 2008-09 New Policy Proposal (ASPLAIN Format for the Registration of 4-byte ASNs)

[Marco Hogewoning marcoh@localhost]

On Oct 22, 2008, at 5:00 PM, Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet wrote:

> I presume in general the answer would be NO to your (question). But
> please stop bashing RIPE for respecting its own internal procedures.
I agree with Thomas and I don't see this as 'RIPE bashing' merely as  
an attempt to keep things simple and avoid lengthy debates on  
something trivial, especially in this case where the pros and cons  
should be raised in the IETF.
> > Let's keep things simple please!
> Indeed, but I guess you would not recommend to "simply" change a
> formally adopted policy document, would you? This could be seen as
> a nasty precedent...
You have a point there and it we might call it an oversight in the PDP  
to not be able to handle small changes in formatting or typos without  
going through the whole process again. So for the sake of it all,  
let's adopt this change using the current proces and focus the  
discussion on how to handle such changes in the future. I don't expect  
it to happen much, but the way you put it a small cosmetic error can  
result in going over a lenghty discussion again and might be a tool to  
bend things differently by the need to reach consensus again.
MarcoH