Re: [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 New Draft Document Published (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
-
To: michael.dillon@localhost
-
From: "Jeffrey A. Williams" jwkckid1@localhost
-
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2008 17:56:26 -0700
-
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=ix.netcom.com; b=XuVdZJxnbw+LstKRY6Q1a2zKWMTdeTHCt9qIR6db9PlTDMlq1uEcK4Vu0bDg116M; h=Received:Message-ID:Date:From:Organization:X-Mailer:X-Accept-Language:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject:References:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
-
Organization: IDNS and Spokesman for INEGroup
Michael and all,
I concur with Michael here...
michael.dillon@localhost wrote:
> > as the comment period for the v3 of 2007-08 is nearing its
> > end (one week left), please send your comments about it to the list.
>
> 2007-08 <http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2007-08.html>
> is a dishonest policy. It enables buying and selling of IP address
> blocks without saying anything about how this relates to the statement
> in RIPE-421 (The IPv6 policy) which says:
>
> It is contrary to the goals of this document
> and is not in the interests of the Internet
> community as a whole for address space to be
> considered freehold property.
>
> RIPE policy and practice already allows LIRs to return surplus
> addresses to RIPE. If an LIR finds itself in a position to have
> surplus IPv4 addresses (very unlikely) then why do we need to
> change the existing practice?
>
> I can see only one motivation for this change, and that is to allow
> LIRs to sell address space, and I believe that this is contrary
> to the interests of the entire IP networking community.
>
> 2007-08 should be rejected because no consensus has been formed and
> we have seen very little discussion of the points outlined by Sander
> Steffann
> in his email of June 13th.
> <http://www.ripe.net/ripe/maillists/archives/address-policy-wg/2008/msg0
> 0382.html>
>
> --Michael Dillon
Regards,
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 281k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
Abraham Lincoln
"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt
"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS.
div. of Information Network Eng. INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail
jwkckid1@localhost
My Phone: 214-244-4827
|