Re: [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 New Draft Document Published (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
-
To: michael.dillon@localhost
-
From: Gert Doering gert@localhost
-
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2008 16:26:19 +0200
-
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
-
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=testkey; d=space.net; b=mbdF8hNQNWzQe23YravITu70GmKl1DGLE16hlla8E2u7buOlmhtIAc8Nrw0QoZA1 ;
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 02:06:37PM +0100, michael.dillon@localhost wrote:
> > as the comment period for the v3 of 2007-08 is nearing its
> > end (one week left), please send your comments about it to the list.
>
> 2007-08 <http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2007-08.html>
> is a dishonest policy. It enables buying and selling of IP address
> blocks without saying anything about how this relates to the statement
> in RIPE-421 (The IPv6 policy) which says:
>
> It is contrary to the goals of this document
> and is not in the interests of the Internet
> community as a whole for address space to be
> considered freehold property.
Why should an IPv4 policy document take IPv6 policy documents into
account? "Different circumstances".
> 2007-08 should be rejected because no consensus has been formed and
This is exactly the point of a "v3" of this document: take into account
previous discussions and comments, and try finding a consensus on the
reworked document.
The argument "I reject this version because no consensus was formed on
a previous version" is not a very useful contribution, in itself - if
you have specific issues with *v3* (or your concerns about v1 and v2
are still un-addressed), please voice them.
Gert Doering
-- APWG chair
--
Total number of prefixes smaller than registry allocations: 128645
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (89) 32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
|