Re: [address-policy-wg] Re: Revised 2007-01 set back to Review Phase (Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC)
-
To: Peter Galbavy <peter.galbavy@localhost
-
From: Florian Weimer fweimer@localhost
-
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2008 13:30:43 +0200
-
Cc: Gert Doering gert@localhost, Bernhard Schmidt berni@localhost, David Monosov davidm@localhost, address-policy-wg@localhost
* Peter Galbavy:
> Florian Weimer wrote:
>> ... with PI, waste is at least visible).
>
> Once again, and again, and maybe one more time:
>
> Just because a PI prefix does not appear in *your* global routeing
> table does not mean it is not in active and valid use.
Sure. But even if you don't route it publicly, you still should keep
the information in the RIPE database up-to-date. If nobody announces
the prefix, and the organization mentioned in the database does not
exist anymore, it surely smells unused.
--
Florian Weimer fweimer@localhost
BFK edv-consulting GmbH http://www.bfk.de/
Kriegsstraße 100 tel: +49-721-96201-1
D-76133 Karlsruhe fax: +49-721-96201-99
|