|
|
 |
Re: [address-policy-wg] new policy idea for PA allocations
-
To: Remco van Mook <Remco.vanMook@localhost
-
From: David Conrad drc@localhost
-
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 09:27:40 -0700
-
Cc: <matthew.ford@localhost, shane@localhost, address-policy-wg@localhost
Remco,
Could someone submit another request immediately afterwards though,
since current policies are based on need?
if you again qualify for another allocation you can come back for
one. If
that's immediate, it's immediate.
What's the point? If I qualify for a /15 and I want a /15 but all the
RIR has available is a bunch of /18s, I'll take those /18s.
The point is quite simple - why bother being strict in allocating
small
blocks when in the end you're going to hand them over to a single
request anyway. I don't want anyone filing a request that cleans out
the
cupboard in one go.
So, you're proposing the addition of increased administrative overhead
(in the form of requiring multiple applications for address space to
obtain the amount of address space originally requested) as a
mechanism to reduce the demand on the fragmented pool?
Thanks,
-drc
|
|
|
|
