|
|
 |
RE: [address-policy-wg] new policy idea for PA allocations
-
To: <Remco.vanMook@localhost, shane@localhost
-
From: <matthew.ford@localhost
-
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 11:12:44 +0100
Remco,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: address-policy-wg-admin@localhost
> [ ] On Behalf Of Remco van Mook
> Sent: 07 August 2008 10:12
> Subject: RE: [address-policy-wg] new policy idea for PA allocations
>
> > Could someone submit another request immediately afterwards though,
> > since current policies are based on need?
>
> That's why I referred to the 80% rule in my mail - if you
> again qualify
> for another allocation you can come back for one. If that's immediate,
> it's immediate.
What's the point? If I qualify for a /15 and I want a /15 but all the
RIR has available is a bunch of /18s, I'll take those /18s. That sucks
but it doesn't suck as much as if I have to make 8 applications to get
those /18s.
|
|
|
|
