Re: Ownerless PI Revokation, was Re: [address-policy-wg] Revised 2007-01...
-
To: Randy Bush randy@localhost
-
From: "Clive D.W. Feather" clive@localhost
-
Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2008 12:04:09 +0100
-
Cc: Gert Doering gert@localhost, address-policy-wg@localhost
Randy Bush said:
> of course the rules of 'contract' vary between cultures. and i am not a
> lawyer. i am told that in the states, one does not need paper, it is an
> exchange with an understanding. e.g. handshakes can be enforced if
> shown to be unequivocal.
True.
However, at least in England, a contract requires "consideration". That is,
each side must be giving something to the other. I have trouble seeing
where that is in the case of an IP address allocation. I don't know whether
US law recognises the concept or not.
In Scotland consideration is not required, so the situation may be
different.
--
Clive D.W. Feather | Work: clive@localhost | Tel: +44 20 8495 6138
Internet Expert | Home: clive@localhost | Fax: +44 870 051 9937
Demon Internet | WWW: http://www.davros.org | Mobile: +44 7973 377646
THUS plc | |
|