Re: [address-policy-wg] 2007-01 Last Call for Comments (Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC)
-
To: Jeroen Massar jeroen@localhost
-
From: Sander Steffann <s.steffann@localhost
-
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2008 17:12:46 +0200
-
Cc: Frederic frederic@localhost, Ian.Meikle@localhost, address-policy-wg@localhost
Hi,
Op 9 apr 2008, om 13:24 heeft Jeroen Massar het volgende geschreven:
of course IP are not domain.
i explain that is interesting to have the possiblity to have
relationship with ripe when your are an internet ressource holder
without to be be a LIR.
And to do that you will need to sign a contract with RIPE.
Important note: it is preferred that you have a contract with an LIR
for your PI space. If you can't or won't do that, you can have a
contract with RIPE NCC directly. The intention is to do as much as
possible throught the existing LIR structure. Because it is provider
independent, switching between LIRs is ofcourse not a problem.
It is not the intention to force everyone to have a contract directly
with the RIPE NCC. As Axel pointed out in the last RIPE meeting, this
would lead to an unwanted situation. There is still freedom for the
end user in choosing the LIR to do business with.
Sander Steffann
|