Re: [address-policy-wg] 2007-01 Last Call for Comments (Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC)

[Frederic frederic@localhost]

> 
> You have a simple two way choice:
>   - you sign a contract and get your PI
>   - you don't sign a contract and you don't.
> 

Today is not true. the 2007-1 change what is possible today. 

Today if i justify to receive a PI, i have it without any Contractual
Obligation.

i add information in ripe database and update it.



> 
> > if you need PI and after you grow, you can become LIR and change you PI
> > with PA and like this have a contract with RIPE.
> 
> PI can't be converted to PA. PI is for end-sites. PA is for ISP's who 
> provide aggregated connectivity to end-sites.
> 
 and PI may be a step before PA...


> 
> What where your requirements again for all of this?
> 
the problem is to put a new restriction.
the 2007-1 say:

NOW when you want any internet ressource you MUST be contract with the ,
agree with the ripe etc...

you can not imagine ALL possibility and you must not say now is like
this and no way for the other.

we would like let a choice, yes a little choice for a little window...


we beleive that a step :  MAY be established before MUST Be established,
let ripe to proposal best contract to interest organisation that today
has no contract for their own reason... (politacal, technic....what ever
i do not know. but i not judge to say if it is good or bad,  or it must
be like this than like that.)



bst regards.
Frederic

> Greets,
>   Jeroen
> 
>