Re: [address-policy-wg] 2007-01 Last Call for Comments (Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC)

[Max Tulyev president@localhost]

Sure, dealing with domains is like IP networks.

But unlike domains, PI IP networks is not billed yearly (yet).

May be we should return back old charging scheme when PI is billed
yearly to LIRs? This will enforce return unused space, make contracts
between LIRs and end-users, and so on just *automagically* ;)

frederic@localhost wrote:
>> Frederic,
>>
>> current system is NOT working well.
>>
>> Just because we can't trace dead companies and dead assignments and
>> reuse it. In 1-2 years all unused space will be assigned.
>>
> 
> I suppose all (dead-compagny) block has an ripe datatabse record ?
> 
> can use the same way that a drop domain name ?
> 
> 
>> But if even that policy will be implemented - how we can enforce it? How
>> can we revoke that space if need?
>>
> 
> I think that domain name way is interesting to implement ?
> 
> before to be a contractual document, is a moral contract.
> 
> bst regards.
> Frederic
> 
>> Frederic wrote:
>>> We support if:
>>> No Fees is required for this contractual relationship.
>>> and this contractual relation ship do not exist between and user and one
>>> LIR.
>>>
>>> else
>>> we do not support, today system works well.
>>
>> --
>> WBR,
>> Max Tulyev (MT6561-RIPE, 2:463/253@localhost)
>>
> 
> 


-- 
WBR,
Max Tulyev (MT6561-RIPE, 2:463/253@localhost)