Re: [address-policy-wg] proposal about 2007-1

[Frederic frederic@localhost]

> 
> - changing "must" to "may" means no change from the current position
> 

that change all, because the holder can have choice. if you don't have
contract or break it for any reason : all your internet ressource are
keep back.

It's OK for PA : is it the main stream of the internet. but we do not
want for PI.

> Your argument appears to be "I just don't want to have to pay for address 
> space", and nothing more.  This is neither a proper argument nor a 
> sustainable position.
> 

No i do not say i do not want PAY : this is WRONG.

i say we want to have choice for some internet ressource.


> As the proposer of this policy change, I don't believe that you have 
> provided any substantial justification for your opinions.
> 
> If you feel strongly about this, please feel free to either provide 
> credible justification or else submit an alternative policy proposal.
> 
> 

we think that credible to fight for a little space of freedom and it is
really a question of freedom.


bst regards
Frederic



> Nick Hilliard