Re: [address-policy-wg] 2007-01 Last Call for Comments(Direct Internet Resource Assignments to End Users from the RIPE NCC)
-
To: Sander Steffann <s.steffann@localhost
-
From: Frederic frederic@localhost
-
Date: Tue, 08 Apr 2008 17:16:14 +0200
Le mardi 08 avril 2008 à 17:01 +0200, Sander Steffann a écrit :
> Hi Frederic,
>
> >> > PI holders must maintain an up to date e-mail address with the RIPE
> >> > NCC. If they do not, the PI space will be returned to the unused
> >> > pool.
> >>
> >> How do you know if it's up to date - or even listened to? Best way is a
> >> contract that says they pay a sum yearly. If the cheque doesn't arrive,
> >> or
> >> bounces, you take the space back. A small sum like €100/year would
> >> suffice.
> >
> > i will give you 10000 bucks and during 100 years it will not what your
> > problem, what the block became.
>
> It still remains a problem. This proposal is not about the money. It is
> about responsible stewardship of internet resources. The way provider
> independent resources are handled now it is impossible to follow what is
> happening to those resources. Resources that are not in use anymore are lost
> because there is no way to check this, while other organisations might need
> those resources.
>
> Policy proposal 2007-01 was introduced to solve this problem. With a
> contract between an LIR (or RIPE NCC) and the end user, we can follow the
> resource. We could check if it is still in use, if the usage still complies
> with the policies, etc.
>
i do not talk of money specialy.
i talk about MUST contract, i propose MAY contract.
to find what become the ressource, i propose a procedure like domain.
because today with PI-IPV4 , is it possible to do not have contract.
this possibility is a little windows of freedom, we ask to not close it.
bst regards.
Frederic
> - Sander
>
|