Re: [address-policy-wg] Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources
-
To: Florian Weimer fw@localhost
-
From: bmanning@localhost
-
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 18:19:03 +0000
-
Cc: Nick Hilliard nick@localhost, Hank Nussbacher hank@localhost, address-policy-wg@localhost
On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 04:34:31PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Nick Hilliard:
>
> > Hank Nussbacher wrote:
> >> Unfortunately, RIPE has never used the word "lease" after 2001. The
> >> word "lease" was removed when the doc became policy:
> >
> > In countries whose legal system is derived from the british legal
> > code, the word "lease" can attract the attention of the tax
> > authorities who like to feel that all leases should be officially
> > stamped and should therefore incur a stamp duty of several per cent of
> > the lease cost.
>
> Over here, a lease implies that it's RIPE NCC's job to make sure that
> the prefix is and remains in usable shape for its intended purpose
> (globally routeable, not blacklisted etc.).
does RIPE NCC -really- provide assurance that a prefix
it hands out is globally routable?
` Or is that just an implied aspect of the term "lease",
which is not in use these days?
--bill
|