About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section

Re: [off-topic] Re: [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 Moved to Review Phase (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)

  • To: Shane Kerr shane@localhost
  • From: bmanning@localhost
  • Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 16:24:28 +0000
  • Cc: bmanning@localhost, address-policy-wg@localhost

On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 05:18:15PM +0100, Shane Kerr wrote:
> Bill,
> 
> [ Apologies for the following rant... ]
> 
> So, as far as I can tell, the "one size fits all" idea is an attempt
> to further the IETF anti-NAT jihad, and has nothing to do with
> anyone's operational needs. :-(

	snicker... :)
	
	a /56 is a tad over 1000 networks, each the size of the
	entire IPv4 space.  Michaels claim that its going to be
	a tough "squeeze" to shoehorn an operational network into
	that small number of bits is enough to make me snort
	the diet coke out my nose in the morning.  Humourous
	and a bit painful at the same time.

--bill

> 
> --
> Shane




 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | © RIPE Community. All rights reserved.
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community