Re: [off-topic] Re: [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 Moved to Review Phase (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
-
To: Shane Kerr shane@localhost
-
From: bmanning@localhost
-
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 16:24:28 +0000
-
Cc: bmanning@localhost, address-policy-wg@localhost
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 05:18:15PM +0100, Shane Kerr wrote:
> Bill,
>
> [ Apologies for the following rant... ]
>
> So, as far as I can tell, the "one size fits all" idea is an attempt
> to further the IETF anti-NAT jihad, and has nothing to do with
> anyone's operational needs. :-(
snicker... :)
a /56 is a tad over 1000 networks, each the size of the
entire IPv4 space. Michaels claim that its going to be
a tough "squeeze" to shoehorn an operational network into
that small number of bits is enough to make me snort
the diet coke out my nose in the morning. Humourous
and a bit painful at the same time.
--bill
>
> --
> Shane
|