Re: [address-policy-wg] [OT] IPv4 addresses in RIPE database.
-
From: "Teemu T. Schaabl" teemu@localhost
-
Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2008 08:44:34 +0100
-
Mail-followup-to: "Teemu T. Schaabl" teemu@localhost, address-policy-wg@localhost
hi,
Marcin Gondek(drixter@localhost)@2008.03.21 19:45:04 +0100:
> Hello All,
>
> Which policy, rule or document of RIPE describes that if ISP giving to
> customer more than one IP address then those addresses have to/should be
> saved into RIPE database as independent entry of inetnum?
>
> Or there is no rule, and ISP doing it because they want to make "clear view"
> of used IP addresses.
rule of thumb as heard in ripe-ncc's LIR workshop:
everything larger than 4 IP Adresses should be assigned in ripe-db;
dsl end users e.g. are your own infrastructre - you do not need to
assign this individually,
cheers,
teemu
--
No snowflake in an avalanche ever feels responsible.
- Voltaire
Attachment:
pgpV9zI1CHIpF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
|