|
|
 |
Re: [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 Moved to Review Phase (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
-
From: Bernhard Schmidt berni@localhost
-
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 16:40:56 +0100
Filiz Yilmaz wrote:
We encourage you to send your comments to address-policy-wg@localhost
before 16 April 2008.
I strongly oppose this (2008-01) proposal for the reasons James A. T.
Rice has given. Why would we want to forward all the messy swamp space
issues we have in IPv4 to IPv6?
I abstain from voting on 2008-02, I don't think it is necessary to push
address space to people who don't use it. No size fits everyone, getting
PAv6 is easy enough (especially since 2006-02) and allocations serve as
good indicator for the growth of IPv6. Also I suspect this will create
issues with the scoring system for people who suddenly have to pay for
address space they didn't even want. But if the community thinks that
this is a good move then go ahead.
Regards,
Bernhard
|
|
|
|
