Re: [address-policy-wg] "Dirty" recycled network assigned
-
To: Woeber@localhost
-
From: Florian Weimer fw@localhost
-
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 11:04:27 +0100
* Wilfried Woeber:
>> You also need to rewrite Received: lines, to remove records of the
>> supposedly infected address space. And you should do this on a separate
>> server on a dedicated prefix, so that misguided blacklist operators do
>> not retaliate against your main mail service for doing that. 8-(
>
> I really don't get that one :-)
Which part?
For certain mail relays, filter rules are applied to hosts behind it,
not to the relay itself.
> I suppose the NCC manufactures a completely fresh and shiny
> address space object when giving out "previously used" address
> space?
They do. But blacklist operators do not seem to care. (Same for some
routing database operators, BTW.)
Apparently, it's also possible to wipe clean the record on your inetnum:
objects, so it's understandable that the blacklist operators do not
automatically wipe all the records from their databases just because the
object appears to be new.
|