Re: [address-policy-wg] "Dirty" recycled network assigned
-
To: Florian Weimer fw@localhost
-
From: "Wilfried Woeber, UniVie/ACOnet" Woeber@localhost
-
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 09:58:36 +0000
-
Organization: UniVie - ACOnet
-
Reply-to: Woeber@localhost
Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Janos Zsako:
>
>
>>>2. There is MORE than 1 IP address using for mail service.
>>
>>You can offer mail relay service through your mail server(s).
>>
>>The customer(s) should then configure their mail servers to forward
>>mail to the "smart" host (your relay), rather than deliver it
>>directly.
>
>
> You also need to rewrite Received: lines, to remove records of the
> supposedly infected address space. And you should do this on a separate
> server on a dedicated prefix, so that misguided blacklist operators do
> not retaliate against your main mail service for doing that. 8-(
I really don't get that one :-)
I suppose the NCC manufactures a completely fresh and shiny
address space object when giving out "previously used" address
space?
Otherwise, messing around with changed lines *after* an allocation
or assignment transaction is a BAD IDEA [TM] (as I found out ;-) )
Wilfried.
|