Re: [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
-
To: Leo Vegoda <leo.vegoda@localhost
-
From: Florian Weimer fw@localhost
-
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 19:42:43 +0100
-
Cc: <michael.dillon@localhost, address-policy-wg@localhost
* Leo Vegoda:
>> The same as above. This would be an additional process, on top of the
>> yearly fee, not a replacement.
>
> I'm not sure I understand what you mean. Could you elaborate, please?
Yearly fee plus action from the RIPE NCC if someone presents proof that
the contact details may be invalid. If the resource holder does not
rectify the situation, sanctions comparable to those for lack of payment
apply.
> It's not all that hard. You can easily find all resources linked to an
> LIR's Organisation ID in the whois database. You can do it easily on
> the RIPE NCC's web site:
>
> http://www.ripe.net/whois?-r+-K+-i+org+ORG-NCC1-RIPE
The org: field is optional, and it does not necessarily contain a
pointer to the LIR.
|
