About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section

Re: [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)

  • To: Per Heldal heldal@localhost
  • From: Marco Hogewoning marcoh@localhost
  • Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:39:49 +0100


On Jan 17, 2008, at 10:42 AM, Per Heldal wrote:

On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 14:47 +0100, Marco Hogewoning wrote:
That was already clear, but if, as an end-user, I have to get a
contract with the NCC to obtain PI space, there ain't much difference
to becoming an LIR. There could be some difference in cost, but that
would only mean that as a small ISP it might be cheaper to get PI space.


Should we allow PI to be used to provide transit?
If not, would you as an ISP build your network using PI?


Is there an easy way to enforce people not doing it ?

--
MarcoH






 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | Copyright Statement
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community