About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section

Re: [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)

  • To: Marco Hogewoning marcoh@localhost
  • From: Per Heldal heldal@localhost
  • Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:42:05 +0100

On Wed, 2008-01-16 at 14:47 +0100, Marco Hogewoning wrote:
> That was already clear, but if, as an end-user, I have to get a  
> contract with the NCC to obtain PI space, there ain't much difference  
> to becoming an LIR. There could be some difference in cost, but that  
> would only mean that as a small ISP it might be cheaper to get PI space.
> 

Should we allow PI to be used to provide transit? 
If not, would you as an ISP build your network using PI?


//per






 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | Copyright Statement
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community