Re: [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)

[Marcin Gondek drixter@localhost]

michael.dillon@localhost pisze:
> > If the price will be higher, then everybody join to RIPE as 
> > LIR. And then we will have +1000% of LIRs. Do "we" need this?
> > Now everybody is waiting for some kind of statesment or 
> > procedure from RIPE side.
> >     
> If the organizations which receive IPv6 PI allocations, join RIPE
> and sign a contract and pay an annual fee, they would not be
> LIRs (Local Internet Registries) because they will not have the 
> right to reassign parts of their address allocation.
> RIPE needs to have another class of member that is not an LIR.
>
>   
Ok, who will make it? RIPE itself or "we" need another proposal?

--
Marcin Gondek / Drixter
e-utp.net
NIP: PL1181589645
REGON: 140584662
Tel. +48602159929
Fax. +48222012418
office@localhost
http://www.e-utp.net