About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section

RE: [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)

  • From: <michael.dillon@localhost
  • Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 11:27:51 -0000

> If the price will be higher, then everybody join to RIPE as 
> LIR. And then we will have +1000% of LIRs. Do "we" need this?
> Now everybody is waiting for some kind of statesment or 
> procedure from RIPE side.

If the organizations which receive IPv6 PI allocations, join RIPE
and sign a contract and pay an annual fee, they would not be
LIRs (Local Internet Registries) because they will not have the 
right to reassign parts of their address allocation.

RIPE needs to have another class of member that is not an LIR.

--Michael Dillon




 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | Copyright Statement
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community