|
|
 |
Re: [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)
-
To: michael.dillon@localhost
-
From: Garry Glendown garry@localhost
-
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 10:55:25 +0100
michael.dillon@localhost wrote:
- small one-time fee (100-200EUR?) for non-routable PI (take
them out of a defined /32 or so which is/can/should be
filtered by ISPs)
What is non-routable PI?
What can you do with it that you cannot do with a ULA prefix?
Not routed for things like VPN-Connections and the likes ... users
sometimes need unique IP addresses, as the chance of running into a
customer/partner that happens to use the same RFC networks is growing
... IPv6 will make the chances smaller, but getting a PI assigned for
such purposes would eliminate that problem.
-garry
|
|
 |
 |