About RIPE | Contact  | Search | Sitemap    
Homepage RIPE  
RIPE Community Mail Archives
search  
     
RIPE Navigation Ends
About RIPE Maillists
Maillists Archive
Global Lists
Non Active Lists
RIPE NCC Navigation Ends
Next Section

Re: [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)

  • To: michael.dillon@localhost
  • From: Garry Glendown garry@localhost
  • Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2008 10:55:25 +0100

michael.dillon@localhost wrote:
- small one-time fee (100-200EUR?) for non-routable PI (take them out of a defined /32 or so which is/can/should be filtered by ISPs)
What is non-routable PI? What can you do with it that you cannot do with a ULA prefix?
Not routed for things like VPN-Connections and the likes ... users sometimes need unique IP addresses, as the chance of running into a customer/partner that happens to use the same RFC networks is growing ... IPv6 will make the chances smaller, but getting a PI assigned for such purposes would eliminate that problem.

-garry




 

Next Section
     About RIPE | Site Map | LIR Portal | About the RIPE NCC | Contact | Copyright Statement
RIPE.NET Homepage LIR Portal RIPE Community