Re: [address-policy-wg] 2008-01 New Policy Proposal (Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder)

[Jarno Lähteenmäki jarlah@localhost]

Does this proposal really mean that every inetnum object holder will get
IPv6 PI block? Or should it mean that every PI assignment holder gets
also IPv6 PI assignment?

Second thing. We should try to aggregate more in IPv6 world than in IPv4
world. So if some entity has 4 IPv4 PI blocks it should get only one
IPv6 block if it doesn't necessarily want more. It creates some
bureaucracy but I think we can cope with that.

Regards,
 Jarno

Filiz Yilmaz wrote:
> PDP Number: 2008-01
> Assigning IPv6 PI to Every Inetnum Holder
> 
> Dear Colleagues,
> 
> A new RIPE Policy Proposal has been made and is now available for
> discussion.
> 
> With the acceptance of this proposal, the RIPE NCC will conduct a one-time operation 
> to assign a /56 IPv6 PI prefix to all End Users with an IPv4 assignment registered 
> in the RIPE Database.
> 
> You can find the full proposal at:
> 
>     http://www.ripe.net/ripe/policies/proposals/2008-01.html
> 
> We encourage you to review this proposal and send your comments to
> address-policy-wg@localhost before 12 February 2008.
> 
> 
> Regards
> 
> Filiz Yilmaz
> RIPE NCC Policy Development Officer