Re: [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 New Policy Proposal (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)

[jwkckid1@localhost]

Max and all,

  why can't it be enforced now?  Why can these unused IP's
be reclimed or at least parto of them?

-----Original Message-----
>From: Max Tulyev president@localhost
>Sent: Nov 3, 2007 4:40 PM
>Subject: Re: [address-policy-wg] 2007-08 New Policy Proposal (Enabling Methods for Reallocation of IPv4 Resources)
>
>Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
>>> Leo has already proved that a (fairly simple) reclamation job takes a
>>> lot of time and resource. This is for a /8 that no one much wanted and
>>> no one much used.
>> 
>> Was that the 14/8 thing? Only 129 individual addresses out of 16777216
>> where used. Maybe just reclaiming the other 16777087 would have been
>> more efficient.
>
>May be. But sorry, you can't enforce it now. You even have no time to
>make an implemented in the real life policy that can reclaim any block
>before free IP space will be finished.
>
>So, we have to live with market. Not only because of it.  The only we
>can do is to make that market white and clear.
>
>-- 
>WBR,
>Max Tulyev (MT6561-RIPE, 2:463/253@localhost)
>
'Regards,
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 277k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is very
often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B; liability
depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security IDNS. div. of
Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402 E-Mail jwkckid1@localhost